Presentaremos aqui la Conferencia del Profesor Franklin Serrano y su abstract.
2da
3ra
4ta
5to
6to
Abstract
Besides being extremely volatile, international “commodity” prices in general (agricultural and mineral) have increased a lot in the decade 2000-2010, both in absolute , that is in U.S. dollars and in relative terms (whether we compare commodities with international dollar prices of manufactured prices or in terms of the overall internal price indexes of most countries.
The purpose of these notes to provide a preliminary attempt to understand the broad underlying causes of this marked, and to a large extent surprising, change of trend (a change which appears particularly drastic in comparison with the two previous decades of low and falling dollar and relative prices).
We shall argue that the modern classical surplus approach, revived by Sraffa and Garegnani since the early 1960s may provide a useful analytical framework in which to base this attempt.
As it is well know, the classical notion of price of production revived by Sraffa focuses on the objective material elements in the “cost of production” of all produced goods , including the relatively standardized foods and raw materials which are traded in international markets that are nowadays known as “commodities”. Moreover, the theory of prices of production brings to the fore the intimate and necessary connections between costs of production and the distributive variables.
Given this, the reason why we consider this approach useful for the question at hand is quite easy to explain . We consider that most analyses of the recent increase in commodity prices has focused almost exclusively on the side of demand whether of final users or for speculative purposes. There has been a relative neglect of the role of short term supply constraints and more importantly of more permanent cost of production considerations. And there is if anything an even greater neglect of the connection between these changes in the cost of production and in the distribution of income.
We should perhaps also note that this neglect of cost of production and income distribution aspects stands in sharp contrast not only with the sraffian classical surplus approach but also with the analyses of the pioneers of development economics such as Singer, Prebisch and Lewis, who focused on precisely these aspects when studying the long run trends of terms of trade.
ver aca
ver aca
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario